No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) emphasize that Hashem (ה׳) spared tzadikim from bad smells during traumatic moments—Moshe in the basket, Yosef being sold? Smell is the strongest memory trigger. The protection wasn't for the immediate experience but for the thousands of times these tzadikim would relive those traumas; each memory would carry the smell, deepening the anguish.
This shiur explores two seemingly puzzling Rashis concerning smell and tzadikim. The first appears in Parshas Shemos, where Moshe's mother prepares the basket with tar (chemar) on the outside and cement on the inside. Rashi (רש"י) explains she did this "so that the tzaddik should not smell the bad odor of the tar." The question is glaring: Moshe was only three months old—how could he be called a tzaddik, and why would the smell matter at such an age? The second parallel case appears in Parshas Vayeishev with the sale of Yosef. The Torah (תורה) goes out of its way to mention that the caravan of Ishmaelites was carrying spices—nechos, nechosos, and tzri—rather than their usual cargo of kerosene and foul-smelling materials. Rashi says this too was to spare the tzaddik from a bad smell. But this seems equally absurd: Yosef was being torn from his family, sold into slavery, traumatized beyond measure. What difference could a pleasant smell make during such a catastrophic moment? As the shiur puts it, "Mrs. Lincoln, how was the air conditioning?"—it's nonsensically trivial in the face of such trauma.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos (Moshe in the basket), Vayeishev (sale of Yosef)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!