No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Yaakov refer to Avrohom with the seemingly disrespectful term "that old man (zaken) died"? The shiur develops the idea that zikna represents total spiritual-physical perfection, where the body itself becomes a vessel for eternity—like Adam HaRishon in Gan Eden. Esav's protest—if perfection itself must die, how can there be reward or resurrection?—reveals his inability to grasp that death grants an even higher reality: existence earned through din rather than received as chesed (חסד).
This shiur analyzes a Midrash on Parshas Toldos exploring the conversation between Yaakov and Esav upon Avrohom Avinu's death. The Midrash records that when Esav asked what happened to the camp, Yaakov responded, "That old man (zaken) died." Esav reacted with shock, questioning whether there is reward and resurrection if even the righteous zaken must die. The Ruach Hakodesh responds: Don't cry for the dead—cry for Esav who is lost. Rabbi Zweig begins by identifying several difficulties in the Midrash. First, why does Yaakov use such seemingly disrespectful language—"that zaken died"—to describe his grandfather Avrohom? Second, how can Esav's statement make sense? If he knew about resurrection of the dead (techias hameisim), he necessarily knew about death; how could Avrohom's death shock him or lead him to question resurrection? Third, what does the Ruach Hakodesh mean that we shouldn't mourn the dead but should mourn Esav?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 25:28, Bereishis 24:1
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
