No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Lot risk his life in Sodom over his wealth? The shiur develops the concept of *bulmus* — a person so consumed by a desire (money, pleasure, honor) that the desire itself becomes his identity, not a means to pleasure. When external accomplishments replace internal growth, a person loses his sense of self and will sacrifice everything — even life — for what has come to define him. Avrohom's *chesed (חסד)* was internally driven; Lot merely imitated the actions without internalizing the values.
The shiur examines Rashi (רש"י)'s comment on Lot's daughters (Bereishis 19:33) connecting *bulmus* — a consuming illness — to *arayos*. Though the Mishna in Yoma uses *bulmus* to describe life-threatening hunger, Rashi applies it to forbidden relationships. Rabbi Zweig explains this through the lens of Lot's behavior during Sodom's destruction. Lot tarried when the angels urged him to flee because he couldn't decide which possessions to save. The Midrash depicts him paralyzed: should he take gold, silver, or diamonds? This wasn't rational decision-making — it was obsession. *Bulmus* describes a person so consumed by a desire that he risks his life for it. The Yoma case isn't about genuine starvation but psychological obsession: "if I don't have this, I cannot live." A person can become so fixated on a craving that the object of desire becomes his entire definition of self.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How was Yitzchok comforted after Sarah's death through marrying Rivka? The Hebrew 'vayinachem' means both comfort and change of direction, revealing that healing comes through shifting focus outward. Depression and mourning are self-absorbed states; true comfort emerges when we channel our pain into caring for others.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Vayeira 19:33
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
How could Avrohom keep the entire Torah before it was given, including rabbinical laws? The key insight is that mitzvos represent eternal spiritual realities, not just historical commemorations, so Avrohom could access these truths through his genuine search. His entire 172-year journey—even his early idolatry—retroactively became service of God once he reached ultimate truth.
