No community start suggestion yet.
Why did God permit Bilam to go with Balak's messengers but then become angry when he actually went? The key lies in the difference between going 'alongside them' versus going 'with them.' Through analyzing Bilam's sleeping patterns versus Avrohom's early rising, the shiur reveals how hatred — unlike love — is a destructive emotion that seeks escape through sleep, exposing Bilam's true anti-Jewish motivations.
The shiur begins by examining an apparent contradiction in Parshas Balak. God initially permits Bilam to go with Balak's messengers, telling him 'kum lech itam' (arise, go alongside them), but when Bilam actually departs, God becomes furious with him. The Torah (תורה)'s language shifts from 'itam' (alongside them) to 'im' (with them), suggesting a change in Bilam's motivations. Rabbi Zweig first presents the traditional explanation from the Vilna Gaon: God permitted Bilam to travel alongside the messengers for his own financial reasons while they pursued their agenda to destroy the Jews. However, Bilam instead went 'with them,' fully buying into their destructive mission. The problem with this interpretation is that it relies on God reading Bilam's subconscious motivations, which Bilam himself might not recognize, making it difficult to hold him accountable.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
How does the covenant of Arvot Moav differ from earlier obligations? The shiur develops the yesod that this covenant created a new level of unity — not just working for the same Master, but collectively becoming a reflection of Hashem's presence. When Klal Yisrael embraces yichud Hashem as a shared vision rather than individual service, future generations become bound, teshuvah becomes natural, and mutual responsibility reaches the depth of "kol Yisrael areivim zeh bazeh."
Why was Miriam punished with tzaraas when her criticism of Moshe seemed justified? The shiur develops a yesod based on a Midrash that Miriam's error wasn't lashon hara in the conventional sense — she actually intended to help with a shalom bayis issue — but rather her failure to search out Moshe's unique madrega and recognize that his separation from his wife was a halachic requirement for his level of nevuah, not just a chumra. This reframes the entire mitzvah of "zachor es asher asah Hashem" as an obligation to actively seek out people's hidden ma'alos.
Parshas Balak 22:20-21
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
