No community start suggestion yet.
Why do smart people often give excellent advice to others but make terrible decisions for themselves? The shiur develops a yesod from Avos 3:17 that when we view wisdom as a tool for personal control rather than connection to God, every failure becomes a reflection of our inadequacy. This creates a dangerous cycle where ego distorts judgment, but recognizing that outcomes depend on divine will rather than our capabilities allows objective decision-making.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes a profound Mishna from Pirkei Avos (3:17b) comparing two types of people to trees with different root systems. The first person has wisdom that exceeds his good deeds - like a tree with many branches but few roots that gets uprooted by wind. The second has good deeds that exceed his wisdom - like a well-rooted tree with fewer branches that remains stable in all weather. The Mishna takes these metaphors from Yirmiyahu 17, where the prophet contrasts those who trust in man versus those who trust in God. The core insight relates to the philosophical question posed by Plato: Are things right because God commands them, or does God command them because they're inherently right? Rabbi Zweig argues through the Rambam (רמב"ם) that a system of morality not grounded in absolute divine authority inevitably becomes self-serving and corrupted. Historical examples like Nazi Germany and modern issues like selective abortion demonstrate how human-centered ethics bend to personal convenience.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Pirkei Avos
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Mishna call complex sciences mere "appetizers" while basic Torah laws are the "body of halachot"? The shiur develops a yesod that Torah engages the complete person - intellect, emotions, and body - creating "total knowledge," while secular wisdom only exercises the mind. This explains why the same Torah texts yield new insights from childhood to old age, unlike progressive secular education.
Why is silence called a "fence for wisdom" in Avos 3:13, and why is a healthy body found only in silence? The shiur develops the principle that speech can emanate from either the intellect or the body's physical drives. When speech expresses physical impulses rather than refined thought, the body gains independent momentum and man deteriorates from "adam" (person) into "basar" (flesh)—the transformation that occurred at the flood.
Why does the Mishna say there are three crowns when it lists four, and why is Kesser Shem Tov superior to the crowns of Torah, Kehunah, and Malchus? The shiur explains that Shem Tov means becoming the living definition of what's humanly possible—like Hillel, Rabbi Elazar ben Charsum, and Yosef HaTzaddik—so others see in you the true standard of halacha and mesirus nefesh. Chanukah celebrates this middah, as the Chashmonaim became the model of devotion, and the Menorah represents the Kesser Shem Tov that rises above all others.
Pirkei Avos 3:17b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does Ben Zoma's famous definition of wisdom as 'learning from everyone' seem to contradict the requirement for Torah scholars to be erudite? The shiur reveals that the mishna describes godlike qualities rather than conventional definitions - true wisdom means complete subordination to truth, not mastery of material. Developing these four divine traits elevates a person to prophetic capability.
