No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) repeat Rivka's lineage—daughter of Besuel, sister of Lavan, from Aram—when we already know this from last week's parsha? Rabbi Zweig develops the insight that this is not "despite" her wicked family, but her actual yichus. The Aramean quality of being sensitive to others' needs—though misused by manipulators—becomes the foundation of true chesed (חסד) when directed toward helping rather than exploiting.
Rabbi Zweig opens with two textual difficulties in Parshas Toldos. First, the Torah (תורה) states "Toldos Yitzchok ben Avrohom, Avrohom holid es Yitzchok"—an apparent redundancy. Rashi (רש"י) explains this teaches that after Yitzchok's birth, God made him look exactly like Avrohom. But why is this information given here, when Yitzchok is already forty years old and getting married, rather than at the time of his birth when the Torah describes those events in detail? The second question concerns verse 20, which repeats that Rivka was "the daughter of Besuel the Aramean from Padan Aram, sister of Lavan the Aramean." Rashi asks why this information is repeated—we already learned all these facts in last week's parsha. Rashi answers that the Torah is praising Rivka: despite being the daughter of a wicked person, the sister of a wicked person, and living among wicked people, she did not learn from their deeds. But Rabbi Zweig asks: we already knew all this information from last week's parsha, so what does this repetition add?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 25:19-21
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
