No community start suggestion yet.
When someone makes a bracha and you hear it, are you yotzer because you heard a bracha, or because the mevarech said it on your behalf? The shiur develops two opposing approaches to shomea k'oneh—the Rambam (רמב"ם) versus the Tur and Shulchan Aruch—showing that according to the Rambam, answering amen creates your own bracha rather than joining someone else's.
This shiur explores the fundamental principle of shomea k'oneh and presents two radically different understandings of how a person can fulfill an obligation by hearing another person's bracha. The analysis centers on a detailed reading of the Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Brachos and how it differs from the approach of the Tur and Shulchan Aruch. The shiur begins with the Kesef Mishneh's questions on the Rambam. The Rambam states that if you hear a bracha, you're yotzer even without answering amen, but if you do answer amen, harei zeh k'mevarech. The Kesef Mishneh asks: if you're already yotzer through hearing, why would you need to answer amen? His first answer is that amen has a higher level—it's k'mevarech while shomea is slightly less. But this is tremendously difficult: once you're yotzer through hearing, how can you answer amen on your own bracha? And how can it be k'mevarech if you're already yotzer?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Hilchos Brachos, Sukkah 38b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Halacha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Rambam distinguish between immediate destruction and the judgment of Rosh Hashanah? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod that Hilchos Teshuvah distinguishes two frameworks: natural spiritual balance (where a negative force self-destructs) versus formal divine judgment (where consequences follow accountability). The Raavad's question—that we see wicked people alive—misses that judgment aims not at survival but at earning our existence through committed avodah.
What does it mean to truly do teshuva? Analyzing Rambam Hilchos Teshuva Perek 2, the shiur distinguishes vidui (confession that changes one's relationship with Hashem and brings kapara) from teshuva itself (a resolution to change one's life). Baal teshuva gemura requires returning to the exact situation—same act, same place, same person—and rejecting it, proving the past is no longer part of one's identity.
Why does the Rambam frame teshuva around vidui rather than behavioral change? The shiur develops the yesod that teshuva without vidui is merely self-improvement—changing behavior to avoid consequences or restore self-image. Vidui is "lifnei HaKel Baruch Hu," the mitzvah to restore one's relationship with Hashem, which alone ensures lasting change.
What is the difference between teshuvah and tza'akah, and why does the Rambam distinguish between individual and communal teshuvah? The shiur unpacks Hilchos Teshuvah 2:6, exploring how tza'akah differs from mere prayer, what lev shalem adds, and why Yom Kippur creates a unique obligation—not just an opportunity—for teshuvah, since failing to do teshuvah on the last day means internalizing sin as part of one's identity.
