No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rochel say "Asaf Elokim es kerposi" — God removed my shame — when she finally has a child? The shiur develops a fundamental principle: hakaras hatov doesn't require that a favor come with no cost. As long as the benefit outweighs the price, you owe gratitude — even when there's a real downside. Rochel can now say to Yaakov: the broken vessels and challenges are the legitimate price of having a wife who gives you children.
Rabbi Zweig opens with Rochel's response after giving birth to Yosef: "Asaf Elokim es kerposi" — God gathered in (removed) my shame (Bereishis 30:23). Rashi (רש"י) presents a puzzling Midrash Agadah: until a woman has a son, she has no one to blame her mistakes on. Once she has a child, she can tell her husband, "Your son broke that vessel, your son ate that food." The shiur asks: What kind of praise is this? Are we celebrating that now she can finally lie and shift blame to her child? And why does the Torah (תורה) use the strong language of "cherpa" (shame/curse), which Rashi says means "giduf" (cursing) everywhere? The shiur connects this to another Rashi: when Bnei Yaakov negotiate with Shechem, they say it would be a "cherpa" to give their sister to an uncircumcised man. Rashi explains "cherpa" as "giduf bechol makom" — a curse/disgrace. Additionally, Rashi in Vayikra notes that "chesed (חסד)" in Aramaic means "cherpa." This linguistic connection — chesed and cherpa being synonyms — becomes a key to understanding the entire concept.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 30:23 (Parshas Vayishlach)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
