No community start suggestion yet.
How could the Jewish people profit from selling water during Makas Dam when we're forbidden to benefit from miracles? The shiur proposes reading "V'acharei chein yeitzu birchush gadol" not as a separate reward but as part of Egypt's punishment itself—making Jewish enrichment a mitzvah (מצוה) rather than forbidden benefit. This reframes the entire understanding of yetzias Mitzrayim's wealth.
The shiur addresses a question posed by the Acharonim regarding how the Jewish people could have profited from the miracles of the Ten Plagues. Chazal tell us that during Makas Dam (the plague of blood), when the Egyptians had no water, they purchased water from the Jews, making the Jewish people wealthy. The Gemara (גמרא) elsewhere relates a story about someone who saw angels converting dirt into flour on a boat and wanted to sell it, but was told this was forbidden because one may not benefit from miracles (ein neheneh m'maaseh nisim). The fundamental question emerges: if benefiting from miracles is prohibited, how could the Jews have been permitted to profit from selling water during Makas Dam, which was clearly a miraculous plague? This appears to be a direct contradiction.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 15:14 (Lech Lecha), Shemos (Makas Dam)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!