No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) emphasize mitzvos kalos (minor commandments) that people "trample with their heels"? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: mitzvos chamuros represent obligation and necessity, while mitzvos kalos express pure relationship and love with Hashem (ה׳). This explains why converts must accept both categories and why Hashem responds to mitzvos kalos with special favor.
The shiur begins with Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on "Eikev tishmeun" - that the reward comes specifically for observing mitzvos kalos (minor commandments) that people "trample with their heels." Rabbi Zweig addresses why Rashi uses such harsh language for seemingly minor infractions and why only mitzvos kalos merit this special reward. The analysis starts with a puzzling halacha (הלכה) in Hilchos Geirus: we must inform potential converts about both mitzvos chamuros (stringent commandments) and mitzvos kalos. If someone accepts the severe commandments with harsh punishments, why mention the minor ones? The answer reveals a fundamental distinction between the two categories.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How was Yitzchok comforted after Sarah's death through marrying Rivka? The Hebrew 'vayinachem' means both comfort and change of direction, revealing that healing comes through shifting focus outward. Depression and mourning are self-absorbed states; true comfort emerges when we channel our pain into caring for others.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Eikev
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
How could Avrohom keep the entire Torah before it was given, including rabbinical laws? The key insight is that mitzvos represent eternal spiritual realities, not just historical commemorations, so Avrohom could access these truths through his genuine search. His entire 172-year journey—even his early idolatry—retroactively became service of God once he reached ultimate truth.
