No community start suggestion yet.
Was Eliezer's test for finding Yitzchok's wife forbidden divination? The shiur develops a revolutionary understanding: prayer is not passive begging but active partnership with God. When God answered Eliezer before he finished speaking, it showed he was not reacting to an omen but making things happen through his relationship with the Almighty—the deepest form of prayer.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a fundamental question about Eliezer's test in finding a wife for Yitzchok. When Eliezer devised a specific sign—that the girl who offers water to both him and his camels would be the chosen one—was this the forbidden practice of nichush (relying on omens)? Some authorities forbid it, while the Rambam (רמב"ם) and Kesef Mishneh permit it because unlike arbitrary omens (like a black cat), Eliezer's test measured substantive character traits: kindness, thoughtfulness, and initiative. Rabbi Zweig proposes a deeper answer rooted in a revolutionary understanding of prayer itself. He begins by examining a Midrash that identifies three people whose prayers were answered before they finished speaking: Eliezer, Moshe Rabbeinu at Korach's rebellion, and King Shlomo at the Temple dedication. What is the significance of such immediate response? Why does it matter whether God answers during prayer or moments after?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 24:12-15 (Eliezer's test); Bereishis 14:22 (Avraham raises his hand)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
