No community start suggestion yet.
Why was Moshe alone praised for retrieving Yosef's bones while everyone else collected gold and silver—weren't both mitzvos? The Gemara (גמרא) in Sotah reveals that Moshe embodied "chacham lev yikach mitzvos"—a wise heart that thinks beyond personal obligations. While borrowing gold was each individual's mitzvah (מצוה), Yosef's bones represented a communal responsibility that no single person felt obligated to fulfill, and Moshe stepped in to address what the community needed.
The shiur opens with the passage "Vayikach Moshe es atzmus Yosef imo" (Moshe took the bones of Yosef with him) and addresses a fundamental question raised by the Gemara (גמרא) in Sotah. On the evening of the Exodus, all the Jewish people were engaged in borrowing gold and silver from the Egyptians, but Moshe Rabbeinu busied himself with retrieving Yosef's bones. Chazal apply the verse "chacham lev yikach mitzvos" (a wise-hearted person takes mitzvos) to Moshe's action. The obvious difficulty: borrowing gold and silver was also a mitzvah (מצוה) commanded by Hashem (ה׳)—so why does the Gemara imply that only Moshe was doing mitzvos? Rabbi Zweig explains that the key distinction lies in the nature of the obligation. Borrowing gold and silver was a personal mitzvah—each individual was commanded by Hashem to do it. Similarly, every other tribe had a family obligation to transport their own ancestor's bones (the tribe of Reuven took Reuven's bones, the tribe of Shimon took Shimon's bones, etc.). But Yosef's bones represented something entirely different: a collective communal responsibility that rested on the entire Jewish people, not on any single individual.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Beshalach 13:19 (Vayikach Moshe es atzmus Yosef imo); Gemara Sotah
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.