No community start suggestion yet.
Should one learn Torah (תורה) full-time trusting in Divine providence, or combine learning with work? The shiur distinguishes between Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai's approach of complete separation from worldly concerns versus Rabbi Shmuel's view that proper work itself becomes part of Torah. The key insight: true emunah (אמונה) means learning without demanding sustenance from either Hashem (ה׳) or community, unlike having a 'contract' expecting payment for learning.
This shiur explores a fundamental debate in Masechta Brachos regarding the proper balance between Torah (תורה) learning and earning a livelihood. The discussion centers on the positions of Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai, who advocated for full-time learning with complete trust in Divine providence, versus Rabbi Shmuel, who maintained that one should combine Torah study with work (derech eretz). The Gemara (גמרא) presents a contradiction: one passage suggests continuous learning ('lo yamush'), while another indicates there are times when one should not come before Hashem (ה׳) (during harvest and pressing times). Rashi (רש"י) explains this refers to periods of agricultural work. The discussion examines what it means to be 'oser et zonot shamayim' (preventing one's heavenly sustenance) and why some who attempt the path of Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai are unsuccessful.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Should one combine Torah study with work, or rely entirely on Divine providence through exclusive learning? The shiur analyzes the machlokes between Rabbi Yishmael and Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai, explaining that 'Bnei Aliyah' live above natural law where Torah itself becomes their reality. This connects to the difference between tzaddik gamor and tzaddik she'eino gamor regarding transcending physical limitations.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Brachos
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why did Moshe say 'around midnight' instead of 'at midnight' when announcing the final plague? The Gemara explains that Moshe independently chose vague language to prevent Pharaoh's astrologers from claiming error if their measurements were off. This reveals a fundamental lesson about avoiding definitive statements and teaches that true midnight transcends normal time - proving God's absolute mastery over reality itself.
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
