A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Hashem (ה׳) threaten to destroy all of Israel when one leader sinned, but only killed individuals when 176,000 sinned? Rabbi Zweig develops that Pinchas acted not as God's agent but as representative of the Jewish people, who own Olam Haba and bear responsibility to inspire all humanity toward godliness.
The shiur opens with a fundamental question about Parshas Pinchas: when 176,000 Jews committed adultery with Moabite women, Hashem (ה׳) killed only the perpetrators. But when one prince (Zimri) brought one woman publicly with 24,000 supporters, Hashem threatened to destroy the entire nation. Why the disproportionate response? Rabbi Zweig examines the Midrash that states Pinchas deserved reward "bedin" (by right of law) for his zealous act. This creates a halachic puzzle: the rule "kana'im pog'in bo" (zealots may strike) cannot be taught as a pesak - if someone asks what to do, we cannot tell them to act. So how can Pinchas receive reward "bedin" for something that cannot be commanded?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Pinchas 25:10-15
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
