A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) command "lo sikach ha-em al habonim" when it describes eggs and fledglings? The shiur develops a novel reading that when the mother bird sits on her offspring, they become an extension of her being - taking them is literally taking part of the mother herself.
The shiur analyzes the mitzvah (מצוה) of kan tzipor (bird's nest) from Parshas Ki Seitzei, focusing on apparent textual difficulties in the verses. Rabbi Zweig questions why the Torah (תורה) shifts terminology from "efrochim" (fledglings) and "beitzim" (eggs) to "bonim" (children), and why it states "lo sikach ha-em al habonim" (don't take the mother upon the children) rather than explicitly prohibiting taking the eggs. The analysis reveals a fundamental insight about the nature of maternal connection. The shiur proposes that "kan tzipor" represents not just a physical nest, but the bird's acquisition (kinyan) - her private domain that includes the offspring as extensions of herself. When the mother bird "rovetzes" (sits upon) her young, they become part of her being, similar to how "ubar yerech imo" (a fetus is like the mother's limb) operates in human law.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Ki Seitzei 22:6-7
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
