A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why did the Egyptians lend their valuables to the Jews, yet initially deny having them? The shiur proposes that the three-day journey to serve God was meant to be an Egyptian national event, with Egypt participating in recognizing Hashem (ה׳). The Egyptians gave clothing, silver, and gold not out of friendship but because they wanted to be included in this religious transformation.
This shiur explores the puzzling narrative in Parshas Bo regarding the Jews borrowing valuables from the Egyptians before the Exodus. Rabbi Zweig addresses several fundamental questions: Why does the Torah (תורה) use the word "re'eihu" (friend) to describe the Egyptian-Jewish relationship? Why does Rashi (רש"י) say the Egyptians initially denied having the items? How does this square with the concept of "chen ha'am" (favor in the eyes of the people)? And why does the Torah include clothing (smalos) alongside silver and gold? The shiur begins by noting textual inconsistencies. In Parshas Shemos, the original instruction mentions borrowing from neighbors and those living in their houses, while here in Parshas Bo it says "ish me'rei'eihu" (a man from his friend). The word "re'eihu" is particularly striking because it typically refers to a fellow Jew, not a non-Jew, as the Gemara (גמרא) derives from "ki yigach shor ish es shor re'eihu." Yet here it describes Egyptians lending to Jews.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Shemos 11:2-3, Bo
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
