A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does a malach of rachamim need a sword to confront Bilam's donkey when the same type of angel destroyed Sancherib's entire army without weapons? The shiur develops that this malach came not to punish Bilam but to defend Klal Yisrael, using Bilam's own power against him since Bilam had appropriated the Jewish people's spiritual weapon of prayer.
This shiur analyzes a complex Midrash on Parshas Balak that addresses a fundamental question: why did the malach Hashem (ה׳) need a sword to confront Bilam when similar angels destroyed vast armies without weapons? Rabbi Zweig begins by examining the Midrash's observation that while a malach Hashem decimated Sancherib's entire army (one of history's three largest) without any weapon, here the same type of angel appears armed with a sword to deal with a single donkey. The shiur establishes a crucial distinction between two types of divine intervention. Rabbi Zweig argues that this was not a malach sent to punish Bilam for defying God's will, but rather a malach of rachamim sent specifically to defend Klal Yisrael. This interpretation resolves the apparent contradiction with the principle of 'b'derech she'adam rotzeh lelech molichin oso' - that God allows people to follow their chosen path. Since God had given Bilam permission to go, He could not simultaneously send a punitive agent against him.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Balak - Midrash on malach confronting Bilam
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
