No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Ben Sorer Umoreh receive the harshest death penalty when his actual crime merits a lesser punishment? The shiur distinguishes between Yishmael's immaturity (where the Torah (תורה) avoids using his name) and Ben Sorer Umoreh's complete inversion of the parent-child relationship. This represents total self-centeredness that corrupts the fundamental relationship teaching proper hierarchy in the world.
This shiur provides a comprehensive analysis of the complex laws regarding Ben Sorer Umoreh (the rebellious son) from Parshas Ki Seitzei. The Rav begins by examining the technical requirements that make this law nearly impossible to fulfill - both parents must have identical voices, both must be physically able to grab and see their son, and the timeframe is incredibly narrow (only between ages 13 and 13 months and 3 days). The Gemara (גמרא) states that this law 'never was and never will be' due to these strict requirements. The shiur addresses several fundamental questions: Why is the rebellious son given the death penalty of stoning (the most severe form) when his future crime would only warrant death by sword? How does this relate to the principle that a person is judged only according to their current state, not their future actions? The Rav examines various explanations from Rishonim including the Mizrachi and Maharal, but finds difficulties with each approach.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Ki Seitzei 21:18-21
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
