No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) warn us to remember Miriam's tzaraas to avoid tzaraas ourselves, rather than to avoid the sin of lashon hara? Rashi (רש"י)'s formulation reveals a fundamental principle: the baal lashon hara is so embedded in his physical existence that right and wrong arguments cannot reach him—he has become his own arbiter of morality. Only consequences (fear of tzaraas, bodily affliction) can deter someone at this level of spiritual deterioration, where one's sense of being emanates entirely from within oneself rather than from God's external standard.
The shiur opens with an analysis of the mitzvah (מצוה) "Zachor es asher asah Hashem (ה׳) lach laMiriam" (Remember what Hashem did to Miriam). The straightforward understanding would be that we remember Miriam's punishment to understand the severity of lashon hara—if even Miriam HaNevia, on whose merit Klal Yisrael survived for forty years, was punished for a taint of lashon hara, how much more so should we fear this sin. However, Rashi (רש"י) presents a dramatically different understanding: "If you want to be sure you don't get tzaraas, don't speak lashon hara." Rashi frames the warning not as "if you're tempted to speak lashon hara, remember Miriam," but rather "if you want to avoid tzaraas, remember Miriam." The focus is on avoiding the consequence (tzaraas) rather than avoiding the sin itself. This seems highly problematic. Why should the Torah (תורה) formulate an ethical warning in terms of health consequences, like a daily exercise program? The Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Teshuvah Perek 9 explicitly states that serving Hashem to avoid punishment is not the way of chachamim but rather the way of nashim, ketanim, and amei ha'aretz. This approach—avoiding sin due to fear of consequences—is presented as spiritually inferior. Yet here, regarding lashon hara specifically, the Torah and Rashi seem to mandate exactly this approach. How can we reconcile this contradiction?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How was Yitzchok comforted after Sarah's death through marrying Rivka? The Hebrew 'vayinachem' means both comfort and change of direction, revealing that healing comes through shifting focus outward. Depression and mourning are self-absorbed states; true comfort emerges when we channel our pain into caring for others.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Ki Seitzei 24:9
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
How could Avrohom keep the entire Torah before it was given, including rabbinical laws? The key insight is that mitzvos represent eternal spiritual realities, not just historical commemorations, so Avrohom could access these truths through his genuine search. His entire 172-year journey—even his early idolatry—retroactively became service of God once he reached ultimate truth.
