No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) say Yosef reported his brothers' misdeeds to "avihem" (their father) instead of "avihim" (his father)? The linguistic shift reveals that Yosef's intent was to help his brothers, not to elevate himself. The same words can constitute either lashon hara or a mitzvah (מצוה)—the Torah places full responsibility on us to examine our true motivations, even when no one else can.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a precise textual question from Parshas Vayeishev: when the Torah (תורה) describes Yosef bringing bad reports about his brothers to Yaakov, it uses the term "avihem" (their father) rather than the more expected "avihim" (his father). This seemingly minor grammatical choice—four letters instead of five—conceals a fundamental yesod about intention and speech. Rabbi Zweig explains the practical difference between the two formulations. When you go to "your father" to report wrongdoing by others, you are implicitly drawing a contrast: your father should appreciate that you are good while someone else's son is bad. You are seeking credit. Conversely, when you go to "their father"—someone else's parent—to report that his child is misbehaving, your only plausible motivation is to help, because it is against your self-interest. Parents do not forget criticism of their children, and telling a parent bad news about his child makes you an enemy, even if the parent believes you mean well.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 37:2 (Parshas Vayeishev)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!