No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Egypt chase the Jews after the death of their firstborn? The shiur explores Rashi (רש"י)'s explanation that they regretted lending excessive wealth. Egypt's real motivation was restoring self-respect—they couldn't bear the shame of their own foolishness. The wealth from Egypt, not just its quantity, was essential for restoring Jewish dignity after slavery.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes the perplexing decision of the Egyptians to pursue the Jewish people after the plague of the firstborn. The Torah (תורה) states that Pharaoh and the Egyptian people changed their minds and said, "What have we done that we sent Israel away from our service?" Rashi (רש"י) explains they regretted the silver and gold they had lent to the Jews. This raises three fundamental questions: First, logically, the loss of slave labor—millions of capable workers—far exceeded any monetary loss, so why focus on the money? Second, the verse itself attributes their change of heart to losing the slaves, not the wealth—so why does Rashi emphasize the money? Third, what is the overall significance of the wealth taken from Egypt, given that the Jews acquired even more wealth at the splitting of the Red Sea, yet only the Egyptian wealth fulfilled God's promise to Avrohom that they would leave with "great wealth"? Rabbi Zweig explains that the only rational explanation for Egypt's seemingly irrational behavior is that their pursuit was motivated not by money but by damaged self-respect. When a person loses money due to external circumstances—war, natural disaster, market forces—he accepts the loss. But when he perceives that his own stupidity caused the loss, he will risk everything to undo it, not to recover the money but to restore his self-esteem. The Egyptians had not merely given the Jews what they requested; Rashi in last week's parsha notes that when Jews asked for one item, Egyptians gave two; when they asked for fifty, they received one hundred. The Egyptians now realized that their excessive generosity had enabled the Jews' departure. This wasn't just a loss—it was a self-inflicted wound born of their own foolishness, and they couldn't live with that shame. To restore their self-image, they were willing to risk their remaining children's lives, even after seeing God's devastating power in the plague of the firstborn.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 14:5, Shemos 12:35-36
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!