No community start suggestion yet.
Why didn't Yaakov believe his sons when they told him Yosef was alive? Rashi (רש"י) explains that a liar is not believed even when telling the truth. The shiur distinguishes between a shakran (one who knows he's lying) and a badai (one who creates and believes a false reality). This insight explains human self-deception and the critical need for a rav or chaver to help us see objective reality.
The shiur opens with Rashi (רש"י)'s explanation of why Yaakov didn't believe his sons when they told him Yosef was alive: because they had lied to him before, and even when a liar tells the truth, he is not believed. This raises a difficulty from the Gemara (גמרא)'s account of Shimshon and Delilah. After Shimshon lied to Delilah twice about the source of his strength, she nevertheless knew he was telling the truth the third time, as the Gemara states "divrei emes nikarim" - words of truth are self-evident. If Delilah could detect truth from a proven liar, why couldn't Yaakov, whose essence is emes? Rabbi Zweig resolves this by distinguishing between two types of liars. A shakran is someone who knows he is lying - there is an objective reality, and he is deliberately misrepresenting it. A badai, however, is someone who creates a false reality that he himself believes in. The term badai comes from the lashon of "bado milibo" - fabricating from one's heart, creating something new. The brothers were badai - they had convinced themselves that Yosef was dead. They believed with complete conviction that once sold to Egypt, removed from the Shechinah's presence, Yosef would either be killed or kill himself. This became their reality.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 45:26 (Parshas Vayigash)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!