No community start suggestion yet.
If Bnei Yisrael already said "na'aseh v'nishma," why did Hashem (ה׳) still need to hold Mount Sinai over them as a threat? Tosafos (תוספות) explains that hearing the dibrot caused their souls to depart their bodies, making them fear total spirituality would cost them physical existence. The coercion addressed this specific concern, not lack of desire for Torah (תורה) itself.
This shiur explores a profound question from Tosafos (תוספות) in Masechta Shabbos (שבת) regarding the famous Gemara (גמרא) about Hashem (ה׳) holding Mount Sinai over Bnei Yisrael like a barrel, threatening to bury them if they refused the Torah (תורה). The Gemara states that Hashem said "if you accept the Torah, fine; if not, here will be your burial place." Tosafos asks a penetrating question: "af al pi she'kvar higdimu na'aseh l'nishma" - even though they had already said "na'aseh v'nishma" (we will do and we will understand), why was coercion necessary? Rabbi Zweig begins by examining what "na'aseh v'nishma" truly means, distinguishing it from their earlier acceptance of "kol asher diber Hashem na'aseh." While "na'aseh" means accepting to do before knowing what to do, "na'aseh v'nishma" represents a deeper level - not just doing, but understanding that it will be good for them. The Baal HaTurim suggests an even deeper interpretation: through the doing itself, understanding will come.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Shabbos 88a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
