No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the pasuk say "Vayeitzei Yaakov mi-Be'er Sheva" when Yitzchok lived in Hebron? The shiur develops Rashi (רש"י) and Chazal's reading that Be'er Sheva housed Yeshivas Shem V'Ever, where Yaakov spent 14 years before traveling to Padan Aram. The departure of a tzaddik from a makom Torah (תורה)—the spiritual hub connecting earth and heaven—leaves a lasting impact on the community's moral and spiritual level.
The shiur opens with the fundamental question on Parshas Vayeitzei: the Torah (תורה) states "Vayeitzei Yaakov mi-Be'er Sheva," yet we know from earlier pesukim that Yitzchok lived in Hebron, not Be'er Sheva. Rashi (רש"י) indicates Yitzchok was confined to his house ("kol b'bayis") and wasn't traveling. How then could Yaakov be leaving from Be'er Sheva? Rabbi Zweig explains that Chazal understand the expression "vayeitzei...mi-makom" to indicate not just passing through but having been settled in that place for a substantial period. This compels Chazal to conclude that Yaakov spent significant time in Be'er Sheva—specifically, 14 years learning in Yeshivas Shem V'Ever, which must have been located there. When his parents instructed him to go to Padan Aram, he first went to the yeshiva in Be'er Sheva, ostensibly to prepare himself and perhaps to mislead Esav about his true destination.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 28:10 (Parshas Vayeitzei)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
