No community start suggestion yet.
Why did the midwives receive such immense reward—Kehunah, Leviyah, and Malchus—for refusing to kill Jewish children when any human being is obligated not to murder under duress? The shiur develops a yesod that while technically permitted under Noahide law to obey when coerced, the midwives possessed yirat Elokim—awe of God—a level where one cannot even entertain doing what God does not want, regardless of legal exemption.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a fundamental question that troubled him for over twenty years: the Torah (תורה)'s account of the midwives Shifrah and Puah (Yocheved and Miriam) who refused Pharaoh's command to kill Jewish baby boys. The Torah states "the midwives feared God" and rewards them with houses—interpreted by Chazal as producing the lineages of Kehunah, Leviyah, and Malchus. The difficulty is profound: according to the Rambam (רמב"ם) and Minchas Chinuch, even a non-Jew is obligated to allow himself to be killed rather than commit murder, following the Gemara (גמרא)'s logic that "your blood is not redder" than another's. If every human being is required to act as the midwives did, why do they deserve such extraordinary reward? The shiur presents a revolutionary reading of the Rambam's position on Noahide law and coercion. Rabbi Zweig distinguishes between two fundamentally different situations where one might transgress to preserve life. The first is where a person actively needs to transgress to save himself—for example, eating non-kosher food when sick, or killing someone to obtain an organ transplant. For Jews, this is governed by "v'chai bahem"—the principle that one should live by the mitzvos. However, Gentiles have no such principle of v'chai bahem in Noahide law, and therefore may not transgress the seven Noahide laws even to save their own lives.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 1:15-21
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!