No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) repeat the description of the Korban Tamid instead of simply indicating its permanence? The shiur develops a yesod about the mother-father dynamic: just as a mother reinforces the father's presence when he's absent, Moshe served as the people's 'mother' by constantly affirming God as their Father. The daily Tamid offerings functioned like kibbud av, helping Jews internalize their divine potential through relationship rather than mere tribute.
This shiur examines three fundamental questions about the Korban Tamid (daily offering): why the Torah (תורה) repeats its description rather than simply adding one word to indicate permanence, why it's considered a "klal gadol b'Torah" (great principle of Torah), and how to understand a complex Midrash comparing God to a father whose "wife" (Moshe) is dying. Rabbi Zweig explains that in a traditional home, the mother's crucial role is to establish the father's presence and authority even when he's physically absent. The father provides sustenance and serves as a role model, but these functions only work if the mother constantly reinforces his status as father. Without this maternal reinforcement, the father becomes merely a provider rather than a source of identity and inspiration for the child.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Pinchas - Korban Tamid
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!