No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) identify Rus HaMoavis as the "box of worms" needed in every Jewish leader's past? The shiur explores the Gemara (גמרא)'s teaching that leaders must have skeletons in their closet to maintain humility. Rus's ancestry—originating from Lot's incestuous relationship with his daughter—provides that humbling stigma, ensuring every king of Israel carries a sobering awareness of flawed lineage rather than pure aristocratic pride.
This shiur addresses a fundamental question about leadership and humility in Jewish thought, focusing on a cryptic statement by Rashi (רש"י) regarding Rus HaMoavis. The Gemara (גמרא) teaches that "ein odum lema'am parnasah ulsibra elen kein kupa shel shvatzim yufshem ha'acharov"—a person should not be appointed as a leader unless there is a "kupa shel shvatzim" (a box of worms or skeletons in the closet) attached to them. Rashi identifies this "box of worms" with Rus HaMoavis. The shiur opens by acknowledging that this identification is not simple or obvious. Rabbi Zweig notes that Rus HaMoavis herself was a righteous convert, so extraordinary that Shlomo HaMelech built a chair next to his throne for her as the "eim hamalchus"—not merely as his personal mother, but as the mother of the kingdom of Israel itself. There is even a halachic principle that one is forbidden to remind a convert of their past transgressions. Given Rus's elevated status, how can she be called a "kupa shel shvatzim"? The question is particularly pointed given that reminding Rus of her Moabite origins would seem to violate the prohibition against shaming a convert.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Vayigash, Rashi on Rus HaMoavis
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
