A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Hashem (ה׳) require ten tzadikim to spare Sedom, and why does Moshe invoke the same principle after the Golden Calf? The shiur develops the idea that the Egel was not merely a sin but a revolution—an attempt to overthrow Hashem's sovereignty—triggering martial law rather than individual judgment. Ten tzadikim constitute the minimum tzibbur needed to affirm Hashem's malkchus and prevent the revolution from taking hold.
This shiur explores a profound Midrash on Parshas Ki Sisa that compares Moshe's prayer after the sin of the Golden Calf to Avrohom's prayer for Sedom. The Midrash records that Hashem (ה׳) asked Moshe to find ten tzadikim among the Jewish people, just as Avrohom had sought ten for Sedom. Moshe names seven: himself, Aharon, Aharon's sons Elazar and Itamar, Pinchas, and the six thousand Levi'im. When Hashem points out that this is only seven (counting the Levi'im as one unit), Moshe adds the Avos—Avrohom, Yitzchok, and Yaakov—even though they were already deceased. The core question driving the shiur is: Why does the requirement of ten tzadikim apply both to Sedom and to the Golden Calf? What is the conceptual link between these two events? Rabbi Zweig proposes a fundamental distinction between ordinary sin and revolutionary overthrow. When individuals violate the law while accepting the legitimacy of the government, they are subject to due process and judgment (mishpat). But when a group attempts to overthrow the governing authority entirely, the situation becomes a war, and martial law is declared. In martial law, there is no due process—the survival of the government itself is at stake, and even innocent bystanders may be caught in the conflict.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Midrash on Parshas Ki Sisa
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
