A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Moshe appoint Pinchas to lead the war against Midian instead of going himself when Hashem (ה׳) explicitly commanded him to go? The shiur develops the principle that even divine commands must be interpreted through the lens of Torah (תורה) values like hakaras hatov. Moshe's application of "bor shasisa mimenu al tizrok bo even" teaches that appreciation isn't about what we owe others, but about recognizing Hashem's orchestration in our lives.
The shiur examines a fundamental question from Parshas Matos: when Hashem (ה׳) explicitly commands Moshe to lead the war against Midian, why does Moshe send Pinchas instead? The Midrash offers two explanations - either Moshe couldn't go because he benefited from Midian (his refuge after fleeing Egypt), or Pinchas should complete what he started by killing Kozbi. Rabbi Zweig focuses on the deeper issue: what right does a person have to reinterpret a direct divine command? He establishes that when Hashem tells Moshe something using kal v'chomer logic (one of the ten kal v'chomers in the Torah (תורה)), it demonstrates that Torah reasoning can be applied even to divine commands. Just as Hashem taught Moshe that he couldn't strike the Nile or earth because of hakaras hatov ("bor shasisa mimenu al tizrok bo even" - don't throw stones at a well you drank from), this principle must be consistently applied.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Matos 31:2-6
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
