A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) require Moshe to actively command the waters' return after splitting the sea? The shiur develops a novel reading that two simultaneous miracles occurred: the waters split for the Jews while simultaneously drowning the Egyptians. This dual nature explains why vayibaku hamayim (orderly splitting) differs from Dovid HaMelech's kriyas Yam Suf (violent tearing).
This shiur presents a revolutionary understanding of Kriyas Yam Suf by carefully analyzing the pesukim describing the splitting and return of the sea. Rabbi Zweig opens with a fundamental question: why did Moshe need a special command from Hashem (ה׳) to return the waters? By the other makkos, either the plagues subsided on their own after a limited duration, or Moshe prayed and Hashem removed them. But here we find an unusual formulation: "neteh es yodcha al hayam, veyashuvu hamayim" - Moshe must actively effectuate the return of the waters. The answer emerges from a close reading of the pesukim. The splitting of the sea was not simply undone to drown the Egyptians. Rather, there were two distinct miraculous acts: first, the splitting to save Klal Yisrael, and second, a separate makah to drown the Egyptians. The return of the waters was not merely the reversal of the first miracle but a new creation with its own purpose - the destruction of Egypt. This explains why Moshe needed to actively bring about this second miracle.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Beshalach - Kriyas Yam Suf
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
