No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Klal Yisrael only wage war against Midian when Moav was more involved in the sin with their women? Rashi (רש"י) explains Moav acted from fear, but his language of "spoils of war" creates a contradiction. The resolution involves Avrohom's original claim to Sodom's wealth that may have passed down to Moav through Lot.
The shiur analyzes a puzzling Rashi (רש"י) in Parshas Matos regarding why Hashem (ה׳) commanded vengeance only against Midian when Moav was far more involved in the sin that led to the plague. While 176,000 men were involved with Moavite women compared to just one recorded incident with Midian (Kozbi), the Torah (תורה) specifies attacking only Midian. Rashi explains that Moav acted out of fear ("nimtzu m'pach ad bumer machas yirah") because they were afraid the Jews would take their property, while Midian acted as a true enemy ("v'sa gu orev lo lahem"). However, this creates a textual difficulty: if Hashem told the Jews "al tischa bom l'chama" - not to wage war against Moav - why would Moav be afraid, and why does Rashi use the term "shoylim osom" (spoils of war) when describing their fear?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Torah repeat that Rivka came from a family of manipulators and wicked people? The shiur argues that this is not "despite" her background but rather her yichus—she inherited their extraordinary sensitivity to others' needs but channeled it toward chesed rather than manipulation. True kindness requires understanding what the recipient actually needs, not just what the giver wants to give.
Why did Avrohom ask for visible signs of old age when people were already growing old? The shiur develops the principle that Avrohom requested that aging reflect not just physical decline but accumulated wisdom and compassion. This dignity of age is the foundation for transmitting values across generations—and its absence explains both the sin of the spies and the breakdown of contemporary families.
Parshas Matos 31:2
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
