No community start suggestion yet.
Why are converts from Ammon and Moab forbidden to marry into Klal Yisrael, while converts from Yishmael face no such restriction? Despite Yishmael's descendants committing worse acts of cruelty, their actions stem from a sense of victimization and perceived injustice. True cruelty lies in the coldness of Ammon and Moab's indifference to those who had helped them.
The shiur addresses a fundamental question about the Torah (תורה)'s prohibition against marrying converts from Ammon and Moab. The Torah states "Lo yavo Ammoni uMo'avi b'kahal Hashem (ה׳)" - that even after conversion, they cannot marry Jewish women who are not converts themselves. The reason given is "al devar asher lo kideinu eschem ba'lechem uva'mayim" - because they failed to offer bread and water when the Jewish people passed through the desert. The Rambam (רמב"ם) explains that this prohibition exists because these nations possess the character trait of achzariyus (cruelty). However, this raises a significant question: the descendants of Yishmael committed far worse acts. The Gemara (גמרא) relates that when the Babylonians took the Jewish people into exile, the Ishmaelites gave them salted fish and what appeared to be water, but the canteens were actually empty. This caused tremendous suffering as the Jews became parched after eating the salty fish. Yet there is no prohibition against marrying converts from Yishmael.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Halacha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Rambam define the mitzvah of teshuva as vidui (confession) rather than internal repentance? The shiur argues that genuine teshuva requires focusing on the victim—God or others—rather than self-improvement. Teshuva means "return" to closeness with Hashem, not merely fixing past mistakes.
How can the Rambam require a commitment to never sin again when we know we'll likely fail? The shiur develops a fundamental insight: teshuvah isn't about perfecting the future, but about severing ourselves from our past patterns. A ba'al teshuvah is someone whose future choices aren't driven by yesterday's addictions.
Devarim 23:4, Hilchos Issurei Biah
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
