No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Hashem (ה׳) sometimes tell Moshe "go" (lech) to Pharaoh and other times "come" (bo)? The shiur identifies a deliberate pattern: "lech" means Moshe alone confronts Pharaoh the deity at the Nile, while "bo" (come with Me) means Hashem the King accompanies Moshe to confront Pharaoh the sovereign at the palace. Each set of plagues alternates between supernatural miracles targeting Pharaoh's deified status and natural-order plagues targeting his political sovereignty.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a textual puzzle: the Torah (תורה) sometimes says "lech el Pharaoh" (go to Pharaoh) and other times "bo el Pharaoh" (come to Pharaoh). "Bo" implies "come with me," raising the question: where is the speaker, and what is the difference between these formulations? Examining the first nine plagues, a clear pattern emerges. By Dam, Arov, and Barad, the Torah says "lech" or "stand before Pharaoh," and in each case Moshe goes to the Nile. By Tzfardeia, Dever, and Arbeh, the Torah says "bo el Pharaoh," and Moshe goes to the palace. Rabbi Zweig suggests that Pharaoh had two roles: deity and sovereign. As a deity, his "temple" was the Nile, where he performed daily ablutions and exercised mystical control over the river's inundation—a power Yaakov Avinu gave him through a bracha, as Rashi (רש"י) explains. As Melech Mitzrayim, his seat of government was the palace. When Hashem (ה׳) attacks Pharaoh the deity, Moshe is sent alone ("lech") to the Nile. When Hashem attacks Pharaoh the king, Hashem accompanies Moshe ("bo") to the palace.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Bo (Shemos 10:1)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!