A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) describe the Jews in the present tense as "haboim Mitzrayim" — "coming to Egypt" — when they had been there for a hundred years? The shiur argues that after a century in Egypt, the Jewish people still looked, spoke, and dressed as if they had just arrived, maintaining their distinct identity. This explains how the Egyptians could later isolate and enslave them as "foreigners" without alarming other ethnic groups.
This shiur analyzes a puzzling Midrash on the opening verses of Sefer Shemos. The Torah (תורה) describes the Jewish people using the present-tense phrase "haboim Mitzrayim" (those coming to Egypt), even though by that point in the narrative they had been in Egypt for approximately 70-100 years since Yosef brought them down. The Midrash explains that as long as Yosef was alive, the Jewish people had no burden of slavery; when Yosef died, the enslavement began, as if they had just arrived that day. Rabbi Zweig raises a fundamental question: Why does the Torah express the beginning of enslavement through this indirect language of "coming" rather than simply stating that the Egyptians began to oppress them? Furthermore, if the Midrash is teaching us that the enslavement began after Yosef's death, this fact is already explicit elsewhere in the Torah, making the derasha seemingly unnecessary.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Shemos 1:1
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
