No community start suggestion yet.
Why was Miriam punished with tzaraas when her criticism of Moshe seemed justified? The shiur develops a yesod based on a Midrash that Miriam's error wasn't lashon hara in the conventional sense — she actually intended to help with a shalom bayis issue — but rather her failure to search out Moshe's unique madrega and recognize that his separation from his wife was a halachic requirement for his level of nevuah, not just a chumra. This reframes the entire mitzvah (מצוה) of "zachor es asher asah Hashem (ה׳)" as an obligation to actively seek out people's hidden ma'alos.
The shiur opens with a detailed analysis of a difficult Midrash that compares Miriam's punishment to a king who appoints someone to oversee his treasuries after that person praises him, but then jails the appointee when he confuses the king's mitzvahs. The Midrash states that similarly, Miriam said shirah and was called a neviah, but when she spoke against Moshe, she was punished with tzaraas. Rabbi Zweig presents multiple questions on this Midrash: Why does it appear in Parshas Ki Seitzei rather than in Parshas Beha'aloscha where the story occurs? What exactly is bothering the Midrash? Why jail rather than simply removing the appointment? What is the midah k'neged midah connection between saying shirah and becoming a neviah? And most fundamentally, the timeline seems backwards — "Vatikach Miriam haneviah" shows she was already a neviah before saying the shirah. The core insight begins with establishing what Miriam's supposed "lashon hara" actually was. Miriam overheard Tzipporah saying "Oy l'nishosihem" (woe to the wives) when two elders began prophesying, bemoaning her situation as Moshe's separated wife. Miriam understood this as a shalom bayis problem. She knew that al pi din, a navi doesn't have to separate from his wife — Moshe was being machmir with a midas chasidus. When Miriam heard Tzipporah's anguish, she reasoned that one cannot be machmir at the expense of shalom bayis, just as the Mesilas Yesharim teaches that chumros are forbidden if people will mock you. She told Aharon not as gossip but to inform Moshe of a real problem he was unaware of, since Tzipporah was too tzanuah to tell him herself. This was not lashon hara in any conventional sense — it was mamash a mitzvah (מצוה).
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
How does the covenant of Arvot Moav differ from earlier obligations? The shiur develops the yesod that this covenant created a new level of unity — not just working for the same Master, but collectively becoming a reflection of Hashem's presence. When Klal Yisrael embraces yichud Hashem as a shared vision rather than individual service, future generations become bound, teshuvah becomes natural, and mutual responsibility reaches the depth of "kol Yisrael areivim zeh bazeh."
Why was Miriam punished for speaking about Moshe when her intent was purely to help his shalom bayis? The shiur develops that Miriam's mistake wasn't malicious speech but measuring Moshe by her own standards of nevuah rather than recognizing he operated on an entirely different level. This failure to search for another's unique greatness—especially greatness beyond one's own—constitutes the deeper dimension of lashon hara that the mitzvah to "remember Miriam" teaches.
Ki Seitzei (Devarim 24:9 - zachor es asher asah Hashem l'Miriam); Beha'aloscha (Bamidbar 12 - story of Miriam)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!