A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) give different explanations for chukim in Parshas Chukas versus Parshas Toldos? The shiur distinguishes between chukim we don't understand (like kashrus laws) and chukim that seem contradictory (like parah adumah). The second type poses a deeper challenge since contradictions appear illogical, requiring the answer that at our level of reality, rooted in Torah (תורה)'s source, there are no true contradictions.
This shiur analyzes Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on the opening pasuk of Parshas Chukas, exploring why the Torah (תורה) introduces parah adumah as "zos chukas haTorah" and why it's addressed to both Moshe and Aharon. Rabbi Zweig suggests that the unusual language may indicate a mitzvah (מצוה) to publicly announce this chok, possibly supporting the Tosafos (תוספות)/Magen Avrohom's position that there's a Torah obligation to read Parshas Parah. The main focus is understanding why Rashi provides different explanations for chukim in different places. In Parshas Chukas, Rashi writes that the Satan and nations "mo'inin" (criticize) us, while in Parshas Toldos regarding kashrus laws, he writes they "meishivin" (challenge with unanswerable questions). The shiur explains that "meishivin" refers to pushing someone back with questions that have no answer - the questioner takes away the possibility of response.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Chukas 19:1-2
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
