No community start suggestion yet.
Why does God promise reward for maaser while forbidding merit-based prayers elsewhere? The shiur develops a principle from Parshas Ki Savo that God rewards based on societal benefit received, not personal merit. This same principle governs all human relationships—we owe appreciation to anyone who benefits us, regardless of their motives.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a provocative statistical question: if Rosh Hashanah truly determines life and death, shouldn't synagogue attendance correlate with longevity? This leads into an analysis of the Viduy Maaser passage in Parshas Ki Savo, where the Torah (תורה) commands a person to recite their merits before God—seemingly contradicting the Talmudic teaching that merit-based prayers backfire by inviting divine scrutiny. The resolution centers on understanding the word 'hashkifa' (look down). While this term typically appears in contexts of divine punishment, here it's used positively. Rabbi Zweig explains that hashkifa means 'scrutinize'—and scrutiny usually reveals sin. However, maaser operates on a different principle entirely.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Ki Savo 26:12-15
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
