No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) begin with Hashem (ה׳) clothing Adam and Chava, not with creating the world? The shiur explores the distinction between giving aid and performing personal service—the latter being imitatio Dei. Hashem Himself made a personal visit to Avrohom (not merely healing from afar), modeling that elevating another human through personal service is higher than remaining in one's own divine state. This explains how Avrohom knew to leave Hashem to greet guests, and why Rambam (רמב"ם) lists these mitzvos under both v'halachta bidrachav and v'ahavta l'reiacha kamocha.
This shiur opens with the verse "And it was after the death of Avrohom, Hashem (ה׳) blessed his son, Yitzchok" (Bereishis 25:11). Rashi (רש"י) explains that Hashem blessed Yitzchok by performing nichum aveilim—comforting the mourner. The Gemara (גמרא) in Sotah 14a teaches that there is a mitzvah (מצוה) called v'halachta bidrachav, to emulate the ways of Hashem. Just as Hashem clothed Adam and Chava after the sin, visited the sick (Avrohom after his circumcision), comforted the mourner (Yitzchok after Avrohom's death), and buried the dead (Moshe Rabbeinu), so too we are obligated to perform these acts. This is imitatio Dei—emulating the divine. Rabbi Zweig notes that the Rambam (רמב"ם), in Hilchos Aveil (Laws of Mourning), includes these four mitzvos—clothing the naked, visiting the sick, comforting mourners, and burying the dead—under the umbrella of v'ahavta l'reiacha kamocha (loving your fellow as yourself). Yet the Rambam also lists them in Hilchos De'os under the mitzvah of v'halachta bidrachav. Why are two distinct sources needed for the same obligations? What is the conceptual difference between fulfilling these acts as v'ahavta l'reiacha kamocha versus as imitatio Dei?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 25:11 (Parshas Chayei Sarah); Bereishis 18:1-3 (Parshas Vayeira); Sotah 14a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.