No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Og's nefarious deed—informing Avrohom about Lot's capture solely to get Avrohom killed—create such merit that Moshe feared it centuries later? The shiur establishes that gratitude is owed for benefits received, not motives behind them. Even parents who raise children for selfish reasons deserve honor; denying obligations by dismissing motives only harms the recipient, who loses the feeling of being cared for.
The shiur opens with the narrative from Parshas Lech Lecha: when the four kings captured Sedom and took Lot captive, a refugee (polit) informed Avrohom, who immediately armed his servants and pursued the captors. Rashi (רש"י) identifies this refugee as Og, who survived the flood. Critically, Rashi explains that Og's motive was entirely nefarious—he hoped Avrohom would be killed in battle so he could marry Sarah. Centuries later, in Parshas Chukas, when the Jewish people prepared to conquer Og's kingdom in Transjordan, Hashem (ה׳) told Moshe "Al tira oso"—do not fear him. Rashi explains that Moshe was afraid specifically because of Og's great merit from informing Avrohom. This creates a profound difficulty: how could such a self-serving, even evil act create merit powerful enough to potentially prevent the Jewish people from conquering land that was rightfully theirs?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Lech Lecha 14:13-16, Chukas 21:34
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
