A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why did the Jewish people stop performing bris milah when Yosef died, even while his brothers were still alive? The shiur develops a legal framework explaining that Egyptian citizenship meant slavery to Pharaoh, creating a halachic status change for the Jews that exempted them from bris milah until Hashem (ה׳) took ownership at the Exodus. This analysis illuminates the pasuk "ki li bnei Yisrael avadim" and Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary throughout Shemos.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a striking Midrash that states when Yosef died, the Jewish people stopped performing bris milah and became "matzrified" (Egyptianized), even though all of Yosef's brothers were still alive. The question is profound: how could the brothers permit such a fundamental abandonment of the covenant of Avrohom while they were still living? The Midrash's language suggests they weren't merely neglecting bris milah—they were actually exempt from it. The shiur develops a comprehensive legal framework to explain this phenomenon by examining the nature of Egyptian citizenship. Rabbi Zweig turns to Parshas Behar and Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on "lo sa'asu lachem elilim." Rashi explains that when a Jew is sold to a non-Jew, he might think he can adopt his master's practices—worshipping idols, desecrating Shabbos (שבת), or engaging in forbidden relationships. The question arises: why would we need a pasuk to tell us this? The answer reveals a fundamental principle: just as when a Jew purchases a non-Jewish slave, that slave acquires a Jewish status and becomes obligated in mitzvos, the reverse should logically apply—when a non-Jew owns a Jew, that Jew should acquire the status of a non-Jew and become exempt from uniquely Jewish obligations.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Shemos, Behar (Vayikra 25:55), Mikeitz (Bereishis 47)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.