No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Moab fear the approaching Israelites but Midian didn't seem concerned? The Torah (תורה) reveals a psychological truth about denial. While everyone initially fears when confronted with problems, most people quickly slip into denial and forget their fear - except for true leaders like Balak who force themselves to face reality.
This shiur examines a puzzling question from Parshas Matos regarding why Hashem (ה׳) commanded revenge against Midian rather than Moab, despite Moab being more involved in the sin with Bnei Yisrael. The analysis begins with Rashi (רש"י)'s explanation that Moab acted out of fear while Midian was motivated by pure hatred (sinas Yisrael). Rabbi Zweig identifies a deeper psychological pattern by analyzing a seemingly redundant verse in Parshas Balak: "Vayar Balak ben Tzipor es kol asher asah Yisrael la'Emori" - Balak saw all that Israel had done to the Emorites. Since everyone knew about Israel's victories over the mighty kings Sichon and Og, why does the Torah (תורה) specifically mention that Balak saw this?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Torah repeat that Rivka came from a family of manipulators and wicked people? The shiur argues that this is not "despite" her background but rather her yichus—she inherited their extraordinary sensitivity to others' needs but channeled it toward chesed rather than manipulation. True kindness requires understanding what the recipient actually needs, not just what the giver wants to give.
Why did Avrohom ask for visible signs of old age when people were already growing old? The shiur develops the principle that Avrohom requested that aging reflect not just physical decline but accumulated wisdom and compassion. This dignity of age is the foundation for transmitting values across generations—and its absence explains both the sin of the spies and the breakdown of contemporary families.
Parshas Matos
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
