No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Yehuda's tone suddenly shift from respect ("please, my master") to veiled threats ("you're like Pharaoh")? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: Yehuda initially speaks as king representing all the brothers accepting slavery (Bris Bein HaBesarim), but when Yosef singles out Binyamin, Yehuda shifts to pleading as Binyamin's guarantor while simultaneously warning Yosef what will happen if he fragments Klal Yisroel.
This shiur provides an in-depth analysis of the opening pesukim of Parshas Vayigash (Bereishis 44:18-34), focusing on the seeming contradiction between Yehuda's obsequious language and Rashi (רש"י)'s assertion that he spoke harshly. Rabbi Zweig begins by noting the plain reading of the verses: "Vayigash eilav Yehuda vayomer bi adoni yedaber na avdecha davar b'aznei adoni v'al yichar apcha b'avdecha ki chamocha k'Pharaoh" - language that appears entirely deferential and pleading. The shiur examines multiple Rashis on these pesukim. First, Rashi explains that "davar b'aznei adoni" cannot mean literally whispering in Yosef's ear, since Yosef had been pretending not to understand Hebrew and all communication had gone through an interpreter. Rather, Rashi translates it as "let my words enter your ears" - meaning pay attention to what I'm saying. This maintains the respectful tone without the physical impossibility of private conversation.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 44:18-34
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
