No community start suggestion yet.
How did Avrohom perceive all the mitzvos before Hashem (ה׳) commanded them? The Mizrachi asks why Avrohom didn't perform bris milah earlier like other mitzvos. The shiur suggests Avrohom couldn't perceive any mitzvos until after his bris, as circumcision removes the spiritual blockage that prevents Torah (תורה) comprehension.
The shiur examines a question from the Mizrachi regarding why Avrohom Avinu didn't perform bris milah before Hashem (ה׳) commanded it, given that he fulfilled all other mitzvos before receiving divine instruction. The Mizrachi answers that bris milah differs because it can only be done once - if Avrohom had performed it beforehand as a non-mitzvah (מצוה) act, he couldn't repeat it later as a proper mitzvah when commanded. Rabbi Zweig challenges the fundamental premise of this question: that Avrohom was able to perceive and fulfill all mitzvos before being commanded. He argues that such perception requires extraordinary spiritual sensitivity that may only be possible after bris milah. Before circumcision, Avrohom was an arel (uncircumcised), which represents an incomplete spiritual state with inherent blockages to divine perception.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Lech Lecha
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!