No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Moshe fear attacking Og, who only warned Avrohom about Lot's capture hoping Avrohom would die in battle? The Torah (תורה) operates on the principle that obligation flows from benefit received, regardless of the giver's motives. This yesod explains kibbud av v'eim and why our instinct to dismiss help given for selfish reasons actually isolates us from recognizing genuine care.
Rabbi Zweig presents a fundamental Torah (תורה) principle that challenges our natural psychological tendencies regarding gratitude and obligation. Using the story from Parshas Lech Lecha where Og informed Avrohom that Lot was captured, he addresses a seeming contradiction: Og had nefarious motives (hoping Avrohom would die in battle so he could marry Sarah), yet centuries later, Moshe Rabbeinu feared attacking Og because of his 'merit' from helping Avrohom. The rabbi argues that our instinctive belief is wrong - that we don't owe gratitude when someone helps us for selfish reasons. Instead, the Torah teaches that obligation depends solely on whether we received benefit, not on the giver's motives. This principle underlies the mitzvah (מצוה) of honoring parents: even though parents have children for selfish reasons (continuity, fulfillment, pride), children still received enormous benefits (life, care, education) and therefore owe gratitude.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Lech Lecha - Og informing Avraham about Lot's capture
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!