No community start suggestion yet.
How can Ben Azai speak of mitzvah (מצוה) "reward" when Antigonus taught we should serve God without seeking reward? The shiur distinguishes between material reward ("peras" - illegitimate) and spiritual closeness to God (legitimate and obligatory to seek). This explains why we must pursue all mitzvos equally - since we cannot measure which creates greater divine proximity.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes the fourth mishna in Pirkei Avos from Ben Azai: "Run after even a minor mitzvah (מצוה) as you would a major one, and flee from sin, for one mitzvah leads to another mitzvah, and one sin leads to another sin. The reward of a mitzvah is a mitzvah, and the consequence of a sin is a sin." He identifies four major difficulties with this teaching. First, this mishna seems to repeat what was already established in chapter two - that one should be equally careful with all mitzvos because we cannot know their relative rewards. Second, it appears to contradict Antigonus of Socho's teaching that we should serve God "not in order to receive reward." Third, the Rambam (רמב"ם) calls this a "wondrous new insight" and cites Moshe's establishment of the three cities of refuge east of the Jordan as an example, even though these cities would be ineffective until all six were established. Fourth, how can half a mitzvah (which may have no value) demonstrate the principle that "one mitzvah leads to another"?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Pirkei Avos
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi interpret Avos 4:3's teaching about not despising others as mere pragmatism rather than true morality? The shiur connects this to the Gemara's account of three cities destroyed through calculated decisions that seemed logically sound. When we dismiss people as 'too unimportant to matter,' we're claiming control over our destiny rather than recognizing divine providence.
Why is silence called a "fence for wisdom" in Avos 3:13, and why is a healthy body found only in silence? The shiur develops the principle that speech can emanate from either the intellect or the body's physical drives. When speech expresses physical impulses rather than refined thought, the body gains independent momentum and man deteriorates from "adam" (person) into "basar" (flesh)—the transformation that occurred at the flood.
Why does the Mishna say there are three crowns when it lists four, and why is Kesser Shem Tov superior to the crowns of Torah, Kehunah, and Malchus? The shiur explains that Shem Tov means becoming the living definition of what's humanly possible—like Hillel, Rabbi Elazar ben Charsum, and Yosef HaTzaddik—so others see in you the true standard of halacha and mesirus nefesh. Chanukah celebrates this middah, as the Chashmonaim became the model of devotion, and the Menorah represents the Kesser Shem Tov that rises above all others.
Pirkei Avos 4:2
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does Avos 4:4 teach extreme humility by reminding us we become food for worms? The shiur reveals that true humility means accepting all aspects of ourselves - both divine soul and mortal body. When we achieve this balance, insults cannot touch us because we've embraced reality, freeing us from the arrogance and self-destruction that caused the Temple's destruction.
