No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Sarah die from hearing about the Akedah, when the Akedah represents the ultimate zechus? The shiur develops a sophisticated yesod distinguishing between din within the system Hashem (ה׳) created and absolute din. Sarah's demand for "Yishpot Hashem beini uveinecha" placed her in a framework where even earned blessings require gratitude—and the Akedah revealed she hadn't shown that appreciation.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a fundamental question that has troubled him for over twenty-five years: How could Sarah Imeinu die as a result of the Akedah, when the Akedah represents the greatest zechus for Klal Yisrael throughout history? The pasuk states "Vayihiyu chayei Sarah," and Rashi (רש"י) explains she died when she heard about the Akedah—that her son was almost slaughtered. This seems contradictory: from absolute good (the Akedah), how can something negative result? The shiur explores this apparent contradiction through multiple layers of analysis. The opening discussion addresses why the Torah (תורה) uses a small kaf in "livkosah"—to cry for her. The Baal HaTurim explains this diminishment by stating that Sarah brought this calamity upon herself through her earlier statement "Yishpot Hashem (ה׳) beini uveinecha" (Hashem should judge between me and you) regarding the Hagar incident. This seems to contradict Chazal's high regard for Sarah Imeinu, creating a tension that needs resolution.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 23:1-2 (Parshas Chayei Sarah)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
