No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) emphasize that when Yaakov left Be'er Sheva, the city lost its hod, ziv, and hadar? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction between Shem and Ever's approach to Sheva Mitzvos—teaching them as laws to those who inquire—versus the Avos' mission to actively be mekarev people to a relationship with Hashem (ה׳). This explains why Yaakov's departure created an impression: he had a personal connection with the people of Be'er Sheva through his kiruv work.
Rabbi Zweig opens with Rashi (רש"י)'s famous comment on "Vayeitzei Yaakov mi'Be'er Sheva" (Bereishis 28:10), which asks why the Torah (תורה) needs to say both that Yaakov left Be'er Sheva and went to Charan—saying he went to Charan should suffice. Rashi explains that when a tzaddik leaves a place, the hod (glory), ziv (radiance), and hadar (splendor) depart with him. Rabbi Zweig raises three fundamental questions on this Rashi: First, why does the Torah need to state this lesson twice (it appears also by Rus and Naomi)? Second, empirically this doesn't seem true—when Rav Moshe Feinstein died in New York, the non-Jewish population noticed nothing. What does it mean that a tzaddik's departure leaves an impression? Third, what do the specific terms hod, ziv, and hadar mean? The core answer begins with identifying Be'er Sheva as the location of the yeshiva of Shem and Ever, not Chevron where Yitzchok lived. The "Vayeitzei mi'Be'er Sheva" therefore refers to Yaakov leaving after his fourteen years of study there. This raises an even stronger question: if there were two roshei yeshiva (Shem and Ever) in Be'er Sheva, why would Yaakov's departure specifically leave such an impression?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 28:10 (Parshas Vayeitzei)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
