No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Yaakov call Shimon and Levi murderers when their killing of Shechem was halachically justified? The shiur distinguishes between non-Jewish standards that focus on correct action versus Jewish obligations that include proper motivation. Even justified actions performed with wrong intent carry the spiritual stain of the forbidden act itself.
This shiur examines the complex verse where Yaakov Avinu calls Shimon and Levi murderers for their actions in Shechem, addressing why the Septuagint translation changed this verse and what it reveals about Jewish moral standards. The speaker begins by noting that when King Ptolemy requested the Torah (תורה)'s translation into Greek, this verse was altered from 'they killed a person' to 'they uprooted a shore' to avoid portraying the Jewish forefathers as murderers. However, since the entire story of Dinah and the slaughter of Shechem remains in the Torah, what was gained by this change? The analysis reveals two possible readings of the verse 'ki ba'apam hargu ish' (in their anger they killed a person). The first interpretation suggests they were wrong to kill out of passion and vengeance. The second, deeper interpretation maintains that the killing was entirely justified - both the Rambam (רמב"ם) and Ramban (רמב"ן) agree that Shechem deserved death for kidnapping and rape, and the townspeople were culpable for not judging him according to the Noahide laws. The problem was not the action but the anger with which they performed it.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Gemara need to teach that showing someone a smile is better than giving them milk? Genuine smiling requires anivus - allowing another person's needs to penetrate and reshape your internal emotional state, which is far more invasive than giving external resources. This connects to malchus, where a true king absorbs others' needs so completely that they become his own needs.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Parshas Vayechi - Yaakov's blessing to Shimon and Levi
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does Yaakov criticize Reuven for being hasty rather than for his actual sin? The shiur explains that 'pachaz kamayim' reveals a fundamental loss of self-respect and self-control. Someone who cannot control himself lacks the inner worthiness required for kingship and kehunah, which demand projecting strength and blessing others.
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
