No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) introduce the last three plagues with a new preamble? The shiur identifies two distinct dimensions in the mitzvah (מצוה) of telling over Yetzias Mitzrayim: sipur (recounting the story and history) and hagadah (teaching the obligations that follow). This duality appears throughout—in the two haschalos of the Seder, the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s two Kol HaMarbehs, and even the different language the Torah uses for different children.
The shiur opens by noting that in Parshas Bo, Hashem (ה׳) introduces the last three makos with a completely new preamble—"Lemaan shisi ososi eileh b'kirbo" and "u'lemaan tesaper b'oznei vincha"—which seems unusual. Why does the Torah (תורה) provide new reasoning for these final plagues when it already gave explanations before the first makah? This question sets the stage for a broader exploration of how we transmit the story and message of Yetzias Mitzrayim. Rabbi Zweig focuses on the peculiar language of the pasuk: "Lemaan tesaper b'oznei vincha u'ven bincha." The mitzvah (מצוה) is framed as sipur (recounting), yet in halacha (הלכה) we call it Hagadah Shel Pesach (פסח), and the Torah itself uses the term "v'higadta l'vincha" in Parshas Bo. The Rambam (רמב"ם) in the Sefer HaMitzvos and Yad HaChazakah describes the mitzvah as "lesaper," but Chazal instituted a Haggadah, not a Sefer. What is the difference between sipur and hagadah, and why does the Torah use both?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 10:1-2 (Parshas Bo)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
