A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) introduce the last three plagues with a new preamble? The shiur identifies two distinct dimensions in the mitzvah (מצוה) of telling over Yetzias Mitzrayim: sipur (recounting the story and history) and hagadah (teaching the obligations that follow). This duality appears throughout—in the two haschalos of the Seder, the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s two Kol HaMarbehs, and even the different language the Torah uses for different children.
The shiur opens by noting that in Parshas Bo, Hashem (ה׳) introduces the last three makos with a completely new preamble—"Lemaan shisi ososi eileh b'kirbo" and "u'lemaan tesaper b'oznei vincha"—which seems unusual. Why does the Torah (תורה) provide new reasoning for these final plagues when it already gave explanations before the first makah? This question sets the stage for a broader exploration of how we transmit the story and message of Yetzias Mitzrayim. Rabbi Zweig focuses on the peculiar language of the pasuk: "Lemaan tesaper b'oznei vincha u'ven bincha." The mitzvah (מצוה) is framed as sipur (recounting), yet in halacha (הלכה) we call it Hagadah Shel Pesach (פסח), and the Torah itself uses the term "v'higadta l'vincha" in Parshas Bo. The Rambam (רמב"ם) in the Sefer HaMitzvos and Yad HaChazakah describes the mitzvah as "lesaper," but Chazal instituted a Haggadah, not a Sefer. What is the difference between sipur and hagadah, and why does the Torah use both?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Shemos 10:1-2 (Parshas Bo)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
