A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
The pasuk's wording "Ve-es Yehuda shalach lefanav el Yosef lehoros lefanav Goshen" raises several difficulties: why the unusual "ve-es," why is Yehuda sent to Yosef rather than directly to Goshen, and what was Sarah's original claim to Goshen 220 years earlier? The shiur develops that Goshen represented religious autonomy—Sarah was granted the right for Jews to settle there and practice their religion freely, similar to colonial America's religious settlements. Yehuda was sent not just to prepare housing but to establish a beis talmud (תלמוד) "lehoros"—to make Torah (תורה) the law of the land in Goshen.
This shiur examines the opening verse of Parshas Vayigash after the list of seventy souls: "Ve-es Yehuda shalach lefanav el Yosef lehoros lefanav Goshen." Rabbi Zweig identifies multiple textual difficulties. First, the unusual construction "ve-es Yehuda"—why begin with a conjunction and object rather than simply "Vayishlach Yaakov es Yehuda"? The "ve-es" suggests this connects to something prior, yet a stumah (paragraph break) precedes it, indicating a new topic. Second, the verse uses a pronoun without naming Yaakov, further suggesting connection to earlier material despite the paragraph break. The phrase "shalach lefanav" is also puzzling. "Lefanav" typically means someone is sent ahead as an agent while the principal follows, as when Yaakov sent messengers "lefanav" to Esav. But here, if Yehuda is going "lefanav," that would make Yaakov the principle and Yehuda the agent—yet at 130 years old, Yaakov is not going to run the settlement. Yehuda, as the melech, will be in charge. Why use "lefanav" language that implies Yaakov is the principle?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Bereishis 46:28, Parshas Vayigash
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
